On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote: > remember your implementation is based on gerunds. The gerundial (or > atomic) representation seems to be the natural J way to encode verbs > into nouns; however, in my experience, it often leads to space and > time inefficiencies relative to a straightforward linear > representation and I definitely favor the latter, bugs notwithstanding > (e.g., http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2012-October/029548.html > ) for production purposes.
It ought to be possible to map between these two representations (and it also ought to be possible to achieve a linear representation usable in ". contexts). But that's not anything I am going to have time to try tackling any time this year. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
