Thinking it through, I guess that this example is really (v a) where v is +:@:+, and the a is / , although it might look like u is +: and v is + to my (untrained) human eye.
Cheers, bob On 2012-11-29, at 9:00 AM, bob therriault wrote: > HI Ian, > > If your v includes an adverb such as / the long left reach of conjunctions > could get you into trouble. That would be part of the parsing rules for verbs > vs conjunctions. > > (+:@:+/) 3 4 5 > 42 > ([:+:+/) 3 4 5 > 24 > > Cheers, bob > > On 2012-11-29, at 8:49 AM, Ian Clark wrote: > >> Department of Sudden Doubts... >> >> If u and v are verbs, do (u@:v) and ([: u v) really behave the same >> under all circumstances? >> >> If so, where would I go to find this fact written up? >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
