On 16 January 2013 08:57, Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> Let x=0.6242424 ... .  Multiply x by 100 and subtract x,
>
> 100 x   62.4242424 ...
>     x    0.6242424 ...
> -----   --------------
>  99 x   61.8
>
> So 99 x = 61.8.  Divide both sides by 99 and you get x=61.8%99 . Simplify
> and you get x=103r165.

I would prefer the following derivation:

Let x = 0.6(24).
Multiply by 10 to isolate the repetend from the preceding part:
10x = 6+0.(24).
Let y = 0.(24)  (thus  x = (6+y)/10),
then 100y-y = 24, i.e. y = 8/33.
Therefore  x = (6+8/33)/10 = 103/165.

This derivation is cleaner by treating explicitly the repetend,
referring to a 'canonical' repeated fraction, and by making more
easily obvious what the method is and why it works.

Processing other fractions with the same repetend will share the
derivation of y.  Consider:

Let x = 0.635(24), then 1000x = 635+0.(24).
Let y = ... exactly the same as above ...
Therefore
x = (635+y)/1000 = (635+8/33)/1000 = 20963/33000.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to