Linda, base  x  logarithm  is  4 : ' (^.y)%(^.x)'   for nonzero complex 
arguments x and y , except when x=1. (^.1 is 0, and thou shallt not divide by 
zero).

   _10^.5j6
0.493362j_0.292664
   _10^0.493362j_0.292664
5.00001j6.00002





>________________________________
> Fra: Linda Alvord <lindaalv...@verizon.net>
>Til: programm...@jsoftware.com 
>Sendt: 11:33 fredag den 18. januar 2013
>Emne: Re: [Jprogramming] Hermitian from triangular
> 
>Kip, I just got back to a different and interesting sidetrack on this long
>thread.  What a simple way to write a proof in J.
>
>    _1 = ^ 0j1 * o. 1
>1
>
>   (0j1 * o.1) = ^. _1
>1
>
>
>Therefore:  Negative numbers can have logarithms to the base e
>
>Can they also have common logs?
>
>Also, It makes you wonder if there isn't some sequence out there somewhere
>where there is an ordered sequence of complex numbers:
>
>    i:2
>_2 _1 0 1 2
>  
>   i:0j2
>
>Happy wandering and pondering.
>
>Linda
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of km
>Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:31 AM
>To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Hermitian from triangular
>
>Linda, about logarithms of negative numbers
>
>First of all, you know the number e =: ^ 1 and you know ^ y is e^y .  You
>may not know that  ^ x j. y  by definition is  (^ x) * (cos + 0j1 * sin) y
>where cos =:  2&o. and sin =: 1&o.  .  I first learned this in a college
>math class called Complex Analysis.  A good reference is E. B. Saff and A.
>D. Snider, Fundamentals of Complex Analysis, Pearson Education, Inc. 2003.
>
>Anyway, a famous identity in higher math is
>
>    _1 = ^ 0j1 * o. 1
>1
>
>which should tell you that
>
>    (0j1 * o.1) = ^. _1
>1
>
>i.e., negative numbers can have logarithms to the base e .  For more on
>this, please see Saff and Snider's Chapter 3.
>
>Kip Murray
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>
>On Jan 17, 2013, at 4:22 AM, "Linda Alvord" <lindaalv...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Isn't the log of negative numbers indefined?
>> 
>> This is a problem:
>> 
>>    %1&o.+0
>> _
>>   %1&o.-0
>> _
>> 
>> This is nice!
>> 
>>   %1&o.%_
>> _
>>   %1&o.%__
>> __
>> 
>> 
>> The csc is very small for negative numbers close to zero and very 
>> large for very small positive numbers.
>> 
>> Linda
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Bo 
>> Jacoby
>> Sennt: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:37 AM
>> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Hermitian from triangular
>> 
>> Henry, How is negative zero different from positive zero when taking 
>> the log?
>>    ^.%__ NB. log -0
>> __
>>    ^.%_  NB. log +0
>> __
>> 
>> 
>> - Bo
>> 
>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> Fra: Henry Rich <henryhr...@nc.rr.com>
>>> Til: programm...@jsoftware.com
>>> Sendt: 0:38 torsdag den 17. januar 2013
>>> Emne: Re: [Jprogramming] Hermitian from triangular
>>> 
>>> Negative zero makes sense as a last vestige of gradual underflow; and
>> anyway, it's well-behaved: it looks like 0 except when you take the 
>> log, reciprocal, or square root.  In any normal computation, it goes 
>> away. In contrast, NaN messes up anything it touches.
>>> 
>>> I think we've had negative 0 in J forever.  If NaN is a data virus, 
>>> -0 is a
>> virus that has been inserted into our DNA.
>>> 
>>> Henry Rich
>>> 
>>> On 1/16/2013 4:45 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@nc.rr.com>
>wrote:
>>>>> Negative zero isn't a bug, it's a feature that numerical types, 
>>>>> especially William Kahan, wanted to get into IEEE-754 to help out 
>>>>> some things.  I'm not expert enough to explain.
>>>> 
>>>> Something similar could be said about NaN.
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> - For information about J forums see 
>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to