> way for a verb to produce adverbs and conjunctions. I > have not tested (dont) yet but I suspect that it is > actually more powerful than (do) and it is something > > than has been asked for (do) to do (if you know what I > mean). I am afraid that the door will be closed but with
-(do'@*:') 0 1 2 |syntax error | -(do'@*:')0 1 2 -(dont'@*:') 0 1 2 0 _1 _4 On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Jose Mario Quintana < [email protected]> wrote: > > I guess this is the final proof that given J and a sufficiently > > POWERful > > AGENDA, you can DO anything! > > agenda=. ]^:(1:`(<'@.')) > (atop=. (<'@') agenda 0) > @ > type 'agenda' > ┌────┐ > │verb│ > └────┘ > type 'atop' > ┌───────────┐ > │conjunction│ > └───────────┘ > (insert=. (<'/') agenda 0) > / > > type 'insert' > ┌──────┐ > │adverb│ > └──────┘ > > Many congratulations Dan! You have shown us the way for a verb to produce > adverbs and conjunctions. I have not tested (dont) yet but I suspect that > it is actually more powerful than (do) and it is something than has been > asked for (do) to do (if you know what I mean). I am afraid that the door > will be closed but with an open source one can open it again. :) > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wrote: >> > dont =: ... ^: ... @. ... >> > >> > dont '+: 5 10 20' >> > 10 20 40 >> > dont '+/ 5 10 20' >> > 35 >> > dont '(+/ % #) 5 10 20' >> > 11.6667 >> >> I guess this is the final proof that given J and a sufficiently POWERful >> AGENDA, you can DO anything! >> >> -Dan >> >> PS: Sorry, sorry, I'll quit now. I just couldn't let that opportunity >> slip >> by ;) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
