Even that is not truly identical, since its gerund is different. Identity is always contextual.
-- Raul On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > Please note that SL2 is not identical to SL. Identical would be > > +&:^. > > Henry Rich > > > On 1/31/2013 5:51 AM, Linda Alvord wrote: >> >> SL=: 13 :'(^.x)+^.y' >> >> 3 SL 4 >> >> 2.48491 >> >> SL2=: 13 :'x+&^.y' >> >> 3 SL2 4 >> >> 2.48491 >> >> >> >> Tacit versions that are identical: >> >> SL >> >> ([: ^. [) + [: ^. ] >> >> SL2 >> >> +&^. >> >> >> >> Maybe it would be useful for J to have a "beginner tacit" and an >> "advanced >> tacit". >> >> >> >> t1=:([: ^. [) + [: ^. ] >> >> t2=:+&^. >> >> >> >> Would it then be possible for J to translate: >> >> >> >> t1 into t2 >> >> t2 into t1 >> >> >> >> It might make learning both easier. >> >> >> >> Linda >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
