Kip in
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2013-February/031712.htmlpresented
the argument assuming that the square is perimeter-area optimal
for the rectangular polygons.  The question is: can one show the implicit
assumption without calculus?

I think so: one only has to show that  x=c/2 maximizes x(c-x) where the
optimal value is (c/2)^2.  If one can consider an alternative
shifted candidate x= (c/2) + h  then
 x(c-x)  =  (c/2+h)(c/2 -h) = (c/2)^2 - h^2 <= (c/2)^2 for any h (unless
one is considering imaginary shifts).

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Don & Cathy Kelly <d...@shaw.ca> wrote:

> I did this a bit more simply- before seeing your version:
> 100=2*x+y or y=100-2*x  (treating y as dependent on x)
> A=xy=100x-2*x^2
>  or   dA/dx= 100-4x =0    using  introductory calculus.
> x=25
> I  very much like the alternative that was given by someone else- noting
> that the square has the largest area of a quadrilateral consider a square
> with a perimeter of 200m - or 50mby 50m  then take half of it. No calculus
> needed-(except by the guy who figured out the square (or rhombus) is the
> quadrilateral with the largest area) -just thinking.
>
> cheers
> Don
>
>
> On 27/02/2013 3:59 PM, Bo Jacoby wrote:
>
>> Hi J'ers
>> The communication below was sent to, but seemingly not received by, <
>> programm...@jsoftware.com>.
>> So I resend itfor your information.
>> - Bo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ______________________________**__
>>> Fra: Bo Jacoby <bojac...@yahoo.dk>
>>> Til: "programm...@jsoftware.com" <programm...@jsoftware.com>
>>> Sendt: 20:05 søndag den 24. februar 2013
>>> Emne: SV: [Jprogramming] The farmer's fence
>>>
>>>
>>> Among the many answers in this thread about the farmer's fence the
>>> standard method is not seen, so here it comes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Let the sides of the rectangular chicken yard be  x  and  y
>>> The area is  x*yDifferentiating the area gives  0=(y*dx)+(x*dy)  which
>>> is zero because the area is maximum.
>>> The length of fence is  100= (2*x)+y
>>> Differentiating the length gives  0=(2*dx)+(dy)  which is zero because
>>> the lenght is constant.
>>>
>>> Multiplying   0=(2*dx)+(dy)  by  x  (called a Lagrange multiplyer) gives
>>>  0=(2*x*dx)+(x*dy)
>>>
>>> Subtracting   0=(2*x*dx)+(x*dy)   from   0=(y*dx)+(x*dy)  gives
>>> 0=(y-2*x)*dx
>>> As  dx  need not be zero we must have  0=y-2*x .
>>>
>>> The rest is easy.
>>>
>>> So  y=2*x .
>>>
>>> Substitute  y=2*x   into 100=(2*x)+y  and get  100=4*x.
>>>
>>> Divide by  4  and get   x=25
>>>
>>> Substitute  x=25  into  100=(2*x)+y  and  get  y=50.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No computer power is required.
>>> - Bo
>>>
>>>
>>>  ______________________________**__
>>>> Fra: km <k...@math.uh.edu>
>>>> Til: programm...@jsoftware.com
>>>> Sendt: 15:42 lørdag den 23. februar 2013
>>>> Emne: [Jprogramming] The farmer's fence
>>>>
>>>> Use J to solve the farmer's fence problem:
>>>>
>>>> A farmer with 100 meters of wire fence wants to make a rectangular
>>>> chicken yard using an existing barn wall for one of the north-south sides.
>>>>  What is the largest area he can enclose if he uses the 100 meters of fence
>>>> for the other three sides, and what are the dimensions of the largest-area
>>>> chicken yard?
>>>>
>>>> Kip Murray
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>> ----------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/**
>>>> forums.htm <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> ----------
>> For information about J forums see 
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/**forums.htm<http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**----------
> For information about J forums see 
> http://www.jsoftware.com/**forums.htm<http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to