For i:12 you can do

  -1 | 2 1 0
  -0 | 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 
 +0 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
   1 | 0 1 2

but variants of the stem and leaf display are available, for example

  -1  |  2 1 0
     * |  9 8 7 6 5
  -0  |  4 3 2 1
 +0  |  0 1 2 3 4
     * |  5 6 7 8 9
   1  |  0 1 2

in which final digits 0 through 4 go next to the first digit and final digits 5 
through 9 go next to an appropriate * .  In the t f s e variant used below, 
final digits 0 and 1 go next to the first digit, final digits 2 and 3 go next 
to t, final digits 4 and 5 go next to f, final digits 6 and 7 go next to s, and 
final digits 8 and 9 go next to e .  You try to allocate data 0's evenly to +0 
and -0.

If you can get a copy of Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis 
edited by David C. Hoaglin, Frederick Mosteller, and John W. Tukey, Chapter 1 
Stem-and-Leaf Displays explains all.

--Kip

Sent from my iPad


On Mar 14, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:47 PM, km <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Classical stem and leaf uses truncation not rounding, to make it easy to 
>> look up values in the original data.  For the wiki data
> ...
>> You cannot show the symmetry in i: 12, which classically would probably 
>> appear as (again done by hand, t f s e are mnemonics for two-three four-five 
>> six-seven eight-nine)
>> 
>>     t | 2
>> -1   | 1 0
>>     e | 9 8
>>     s | 7 6
>>     f  | 5 4
>>     t  | 3 2
>>  -0   | 1
>> +0   | 0 1
>>     t  | 2 3
>>     f  | 4 5
>>     s | 6 7
>>     e | 8 9
>>  1    | 0 1
>>      t | 2
> 
> I do not understand how we have any stems other than _1 0 1 for i:12.
> I can see a case for -1 and -0 for small negative values, but I do not
> understand what you've displayed here.
> 
> -- 
> Raul
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to