On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not have to wonder: if there are no teasers; the remaining caps (if > any) are whistle-blowers.
What is a whistle blower? L.([: [: [: [: [: [: [:)`'' 7 > In my mind there is an important difference: this ambivalence of - is the > rule rather than the exception for primitive verbs; most of them are > ambivalent and for good reasons. A teaser cap is the exception to the > rule, [: is the only verb that is not invoked when is the leading verb in a > fork, for no compelling reason (again, from my viewpoint). That also depends on the specific instance of a fork. L.([ [ [ [ [ [ [)`'' 7 > I am also sympathetic to your point. I did not mean to reignite a > controversy that has been discussed too many times. I was just pointing > out some of my reasons to Linda for avoiding [: teasers since she has > previously expressed her own reasons for avoiding @: . I think one should > adopt a style that makes oneself more comfortable and presumably more > productive: avoiding none, avoiding one but not the other, or even avoiding > both. Yes, I like this reasoning. (I have not bothered quoting your message in full, because it's available in the archives. If we were really concerned about preserving context, every email message here would include a canonical link to its archived version.) Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
