The line

olevarfree__p propVals 

seems incorrect and should be iuRelase instead.

Вт, 09 июл 2013, David Mitchell писал(а):
> I tried a more accurate usage of SafeArrayDestroy:
> 
> SafeArrayUnaccessData_oleutil_ memr propVals, 8 1 4
> SafeArrayDestroy_oleutil_ memr propVals, 8 1 4
> 
> This also crashed J801_64 when executing SafeArrayDestroy.  It seemed
> to work ok using J801_32.
> 
> I am beginning to wonder if there is a 32bit/64bit issue with olesafearray.
> 
> On 7/9/2013 9:35, bill lam wrote:
> >I guess at least it needs the memf. To avoid memory leak.
> >
> >On 9 Jul, 2013, at 9:18 PM, David Mitchell <davidmitch...@att.net> wrote:
> >
> >>I changed
> >>
> >>SafeArrayDestroy_oleutil_ propVals
> >>
> >>to
> >>
> >>SafeArrayDestroy_oleutil_ propVals
> >>olevarfree__p propVals
> >>
> >>This did not crash in J801_32 and did crash in J801_64.
> >>
> >>On 7/9/2013 9:03, bill lam wrote:
> >>>Will it work if olevarfree comes after that newly added line?
> >>>
> >>>On 9 Jul, 2013, at 8:24 PM, David Mitchell <davidmitch...@att.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I replaced
> >>>>
> >>>>olevarfree__p propVals
> >>>>
> >>>>with
> >>>>
> >>>>SafeArrayDestroy_oleutil_ propVals
> >>>>
> >>>>This did not crash with J801_64 or J801_32.
> >>>>
> >>>>On 7/9/2013 7:22, bill lam wrote:
> >>>>>Thanks. But there will be memory leak if that line is not
> >>>>>executed. I have no idea which is the culprit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Вт, 09 июл 2013, David Mitchell писал(а):
> >>>>>>J801_32 ran successfully with the olevarfree__p line as delivered.
> >>>>>>J801_64 crashed if the olevarfree__p was in the code.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I moved the olevarfree__p line just before the destroy__p and J801_64
> >>>>>>still crashed when the olevarfree__p line was executed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On 7/9/2013 7:06, bill lam wrote:
> >>>>>>>Did you mean that line worked in 32-bit but crashed in 64-bit?
> >>>>>>>or will it work if you move that line further down?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Вт, 09 июл 2013, David Mitchell писал(а):
> >>>>>>>>Stepping through the code, the crash occurs using j801 64 if the
> >>>>>>>>following line is executed.  If it is not executed, j801 64 does not
> >>>>>>>>crash and the code appears to work successfully.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>olevarfree__p propVals
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On 7/8/2013 21:56, David Mitchell wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>Sad to say, the crash occurs with jconsole 64 and does not occur 
> >>>>>>>>>with jconsole
> >>>>>>>>>64 running under cdb.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>This also happens with jqt running with and without cdb.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>I will have to be more imaginative with my debugging.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>On 7/8/2013 21:11, bill lam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>For the purpose of testing wdooo and openoffice, it can be done
> >>>>>>>>>>inside jconsole.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Пн, 08 июл 2013, David Mitchell писал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>When I try the updated script from the latest J801 64 on Win7 64, I
> >>>>>>>>>>>get a 'jqt.exe has stopped working' message box.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>I have not looked at the crash in more detail, so it was not clear 
> >>>>>>>>>>>to
> >>>>>>>>>>>me what the root of the problem was.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>On 7/8/2013 11:26, bill lam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Thanks, the typo in oocalc.ijs has been fixed and package
> >>>>>>>>>>>>updated.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>64-bit J can call 32-bit out-of-process oleautomation server. IIRC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>I had tested calling a 32-bit excel.exe from 64-bit J wdooo.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Not tested for that on Openoffice, if it fails I suspect that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>should be a problem of Openoffice itself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Пн, 08 июл 2013, David Mitchell писал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I tried the demo script oocalc.ijs on both Win7 and Win8 with 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>the latest J801.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I found out these things:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>0.  Open Office is only available as 32 bit executables.  The 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>wdooo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>code will only work with J801 32 bit, as far as I can see.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>1.  The verb test.ijs would not work for me on any version of J
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>without some changes:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>---
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>test=: 3 : 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>NB. (1!:1 <jpath '~addons/tables/wdooo/test1.ijs') 1!:2 <f=. 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>jpath
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>'~temp/test1.xls'
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>(1!:1 <jpath '~addons/tables/wdooo/test1.xls') 1!:2 <f=. jpath
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>'~temp/test1.xls'
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>PATH=. '/'&(('\' I.@:= ])}) f
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>NB. f1=. 'file:///', PATH, '/test1.xls'
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>f1=. 'file:///', PATH
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>smoutput f1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>---
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I also changed test.ijs to update the second sheet rather than 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>the first
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>sheet:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>NB.  olemethod__p temp ; 'getByIndex' ; 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>   olemethod__p temp ; 'getByIndex' ; 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Once I made these changes, with the latest version of J801 32 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>bit and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>the current Open Office installed, the workbook test.xls in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>j801-user\temp showed this for Sheet 2 cells D:10, E:10, F:10:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>OOo Calc    123    02/28/07
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Which is not in the original workbook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>So the bottom line is that the code example in oocalc.ijs, as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>modified above, will update and save the workbook with one sheet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>modified.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Good luck,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>David Mitchell
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On 7/5/2013 5:16, Mike Day wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>(copied to Bill & Ric)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I suspect Bill Lam and/or Ric Sherlock are the people are the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>people to ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>here,   and but I'll ask the forum as a whole anyway:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I've just acquired a new laptop and am enjoying learning 64-bit 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Windows
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>8.  I'm
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>loth to pay big pounds for Office 2010 or whatever. My 32-bit 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Windows 7 still
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>supported my old Office 2003 but that doesn't run in Win 8.  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I've downloaded
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Open Office which seems to be well thought of as an alternative 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>to M/S
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Office.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I wonder how to continue do the following,  which worked under 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Windows 7
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have a multi-worksheet xls file.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>My J application successfully reads one small named worksheet,  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>not the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>first,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>using readexcel .
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>It uses that information and wished to modify the contents of 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>worksheet ONLY.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Under Windows 7 it successfully called wdoowrite to do this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>However,  I find the workbook is not updated on the new machine.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I had used wdoowrite rather than writexlsheets as it appears 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>that the latter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>overwrites the whole file,  but I might have misunderstood it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>It looks as if writeshtdat might do the job,  but I'm not sure 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>what locale
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>info
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>to offer as the x argument.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Advice would be welcome!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>For information about J forums see 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>For information about J forums see 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>For information about J forums see 
> >>>>>>>>>>>http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>For information about J forums see 
> >>>>>>>>>http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>
> >>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to