Thanks for pointing that out, Dan!
On 15 September 2013 15:42, Dan Bron <j...@bron.us> wrote:
Now, while these two sentences are theoretically fungible, and &.": is cute,
> in reality ":^:_1 is monad ". , which is dangerous (":^:_1 '1!:55 ...'
> for
> example).
>
> So, if I were going to apply this code to user input (or anything derived
> from user [untrusted] input), I'd opt for the former, because whereas the
> leading-x: solution _requires_ code evaluation, the trailing-x solution is
> amenable to a reformulation using _dyad_ ". , which is safe.Shoulda
> thought of it! Cheers, Raul!
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
