Would this feature be more adaptable if it were implemented as a !. feature? I don't have any example in mind, but the thought occurs.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected]>wrote: > Thought experiment: What if i. does overtake on the arguments to ensure > that the item shape of the left argument matches the cell shape of the > right argument? > > I=: 4 : '(s{."c x) i. (s{."c y) [ s=. (}.$x)>.(-c=. <:$$x){.$y' > x=: > ;:'zero one two five one' > y=: > ;:'three one four one five nine' > > $x > 5 4 > $y > 6 5 > > x i. y > 5 5 5 5 5 5 > x I y > 5 1 5 1 3 5 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- (B=) <-----my sig Brian Schott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
