Thanks for making me laugh. It's been a long day....

Enjoy
ken

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Devon McCormick
Sent: 29 October 2013 20:51
To: J-programming forum
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] -: on empty arguments with differing types

It's a good thing.  To do otherwise is a joke - an empty-array joke, in
particular:

A man sits down in a diner and asks the waitress for a cup of coffee "without 
cream".
The waitress replies: "We're out of cream, sir.  Would you like it without 
milk?"


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Zsbán Ambrus <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Ganesh Rapolu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > The dictionary does not say that the two arguments for -: have to 
> > match
> in
> > type so this result is correct. Nevertheless, I would be glad if 
> > someone could provide an explanation/justification for this behavior.
> >
> >    datatype m =. 0 {. 'adaf'
> > literal
> >    datatype n =. 0 {. 10 0 10 10
> > integer
> >    m -: n
> > 1
>
> The J language generally tries to treat empty values the same 
> regardless of type.  I thought this general design rule was documented 
> explicitly somewhere in the dictionary (or the primer?), but I can't 
> find it right now.
>
> As an example, ((0$'a'),3 5 9) works because the an array of any type 
> is accepted, even though ((1$'a'),3 5 9) is an error.  On the other 
> hand, a rare example for an operation that does care about the type of 
> an empty vector is overtake: try (4{.0$'a') versus (4{.0$0).
>
> Anyway, I don't know whether it's a good thing or a bad thing to treat 
> all types of empty arrays the same (their shape does matter, mind 
> you), but J has been doing that for ever, consistently.
>
> Ambrus
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



--
Devon McCormick, CFA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to