Interesting,
So you amend <3;4 with (300"_;{:) .
Now, lets consider the case of box =: 1;2;<3;4;5;6;7;8;9 and necessity of
change 5 with 555 what we have to do?
in this case and with usage of your approach the result will be next:
((2&{.); (555"_)@:{.; 3&}.)@:> L:1 amend 2 ] 1;2;<3;4;5;6;7;8;9
is it right?
Or there is a simple way to generalize amend to derivative of amends
(amend2) :
(2;2) 555 amend2 1;2;<3;4;5;6;7;8;9
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Pascal Jasmin <[email protected]>wrote:
> the simple way
>
> (<300;4)"_ amend 2 ] 1;2;<3;4
> ┌─┬─┬───────┐
> │1│2│┌───┬─┐│
> │ │ ││300│4││
> │ │ │└───┴─┘│
> └─┴─┴───────┘
>
> a tricker way
>
> ((100&*)@:{.;{:)@:> L:1 amend 2 ] 1;2;<3;4
>
>
> the way to find the trickier ways:
>
> ((100&*)@{.;{:)@:>@:> 2 {] 1;2;<3;4
> ┌───┬─┐
> │300│4│
> └───┴─┘
> ((100&*)@{.;{:)@:>L:1 ] 2 {] 1;2;<3;4
> ┌───────┐
> │┌───┬─┐│
> ││300│4││
> │└───┴─┘│
> └───────┘
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Y-01 <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 11:48:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] A useful amend conjunction
>
>
> Pascal, good day
>
> Can you amend 3 with 300 with you adverbs in the next?
> ]box=:1;2;<3;4
> ┌─┬─┬─────┐
> │1│2│┌─┬─┐│
> │ │ ││3│4││
>
> └─┴─┴─────┘
>
> thanks
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Pascal Jasmin <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > very nice, thank you.
> >
> > Its not quite the same, as the explicit version allows for a select verb
> > like picking out the rows where column 2 is prime
> >
> > (0 _2:amdt 2 +:amdt ])"1 amend (I.@:(1&p:)@:(2&{"1)) i. 5 5
> > _2 1 4 3 4
> > _2 6 14 8 9
> > 10 11 12 13 14
> > _2 16 34 18 19
> > 20 21 22 23 24
> >
> > though a workaround is faster for large data:
> > (I.@:(1&p:)@:(2&{"1) a) (0 _2:amdt 2 +:amdt ])"1 amdt a=. i. 5 5
> >
> >
> >
> > I can't seem to get the L:0 version working though:
> >
> > amdtL0 =. ((((@:{(L:0)))((`[)(`])))}(L:0))
> >
> > compared to:
> >
> >
> > amendL0_z_ =: 2 : 0 NB. v is n or n{"num
> > s=. v"_ y
> > (u (s{ L:0 y)) (s}) L:0 y
> > )
> >
> > replace all 4 columns for rows 0-3
> > (i.4) (0;1;2;'f')"1 amdt amendL0 (i.3) (<"1 &. |: i. 5 3),
> <'ABCDE'
> > ┌──────────┬───────────┬───────────┬─────┐
> > │0 0 0 9 12│1 1 1 10 13│2 2 2 11 14│fffDE│
> > └──────────┴───────────┴───────────┴─────┘
> >
> > rearrange columns for rows 2 and 3
> > ((<'f') ,~ |.@:}:)"1 amendL0 2 3 (<"1 &. |: i. 5 3), <'ABCDE'
> > ┌───────────┬───────────┬──────────┬─────┐
> > │0 3 8 11 12│1 4 7 10 13│2 5 6 9 14│ABffE│
> > └───────────┴───────────┴──────────┴─────┘
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: June Kim (김창준) <[email protected]>
> > To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:22:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] A useful amend conjunction
> >
> > I think someone might be interested in a tacit version.
> >
> >
> > amdt=.((@:{)((`[)(`])))}
> > 3 (0 _2: amdt 2 _1: amdt ]) amdt i. 5 5
> > 0 1 2 3 4
> > 5 6 7 8 9
> > 10 11 12 13 14
> > _2 16 _1 18 19
> > 20 21 22 23 24
> >
> > 3 4 5 ((-&32)&.(a.&i.)) amdt 'abcdefgh'
> > abcDEFgh
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Pascal Jasmin <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Here is what seems to me a much easier/saner version of amend to use,
> > > especially for chained amends. 2 versions, one called for L:0 y, then
> > > other without. The dyad version doesn't seem totally necessary.
> > >
> > > amend_z_ =: 2 : 0 NB. v is n or n{"num
> > > if. 0 = 4!:0 <'v' do. s =. v else. s =. v y end.
> > > (u (s{y)) (s}) y
> > > :
> > > if. 0 = 4!:0 <'v' do. s =. v else. s =. v y end.
> > > (x u (s{y)) (s}) y
> > > )
> > >
> > > amendL0_z_ =: 2 : 0 NB. v is n or n{"num
> > > if. 0 = 4!:0 <'v' do. s =. v else. s =. v y end.
> > > (u (s{ L:0 y)) (s}) L:0 y
> > > :
> > > if. 0 = 4!:0 <'v' do. s =. v else. s =. v y end.
> > > (x u (s{ L:0)y) (s} L:0) y
> > > )
> > >
> > > ([: 2: amend 0 3: amend 1) amend 2 ( i. 5 3) NB. replace in row 2,
> > col
> > > 0 and 1
> > > 0 1 2
> > > 3 4 5
> > > 2 3 8
> > > 9 10 11
> > > 12 13 14
> > > ([: 2: amend 0 3: amend 1) amend 2 &.|: ( i. 5 3) NB. replace in
> col
> > > 2, row 0 and 1
> > > 0 1 2
> > > 3 4 3
> > > 6 7 8
> > > 9 10 11
> > > 12 13 14
> > >
> > >
> > > ((0;'f')"_ amend 1 3) amendL0 3 (<"1 &. |: i. 5 3), <'ABCDE' NB.
> > for
> > > row 3, replace col 1 and 3
> > > ┌──────────┬──────────┬───────────┬─────┐
> > > │0 3 6 9 12│1 4 7 0 13│2 5 8 11 14│ABCfE│
> > > └──────────┴──────────┴───────────┴─────┘
> > >
> > > ( 2&+ L:0 amend 1 2) amendL0 3 4 (<"1 &. |: i. 5 3), <'ABCDE' NB.
> > > use function y, to replace col 1 and 2 of row 3 and 4
> > > ┌──────────┬───────────┬───────────┬─────┐
> > > │0 3 6 9 12│1 4 7 12 15│2 5 8 13 16│ABCDE│
> > > └──────────┴───────────┴───────────┴─────┘
> > >
> > >
> > > or dyad:
> > >
> > > 2( + L:0 amend 1 2) amendL0 3 4 (<"1 &. |: i. 5 3), <'ABCDE'
> > > ┌──────────┬───────────┬───────────┬─────┐
> > > │0 3 6 9 12│1 4 7 12 15│2 5 8 13 16│ABCDE│
> > > └──────────┴───────────┴───────────┴─────┘
> > >
> > > more complex function: change row 3 from 9;10;11;'D' to 11;10;9;'f'
> > >
> > > ((<'f') ,~ |.@:}:) amendL0 3 (<"1 &. |: i. 5 3), <'ABCDE'
> > > ┌───────────┬───────────┬──────────┬─────┐
> > > │0 3 6 11 12│1 4 7 10 13│2 5 8 9 14│ABCfE│
> > > └───────────┴───────────┴──────────┴─────┘
> > >
> > >
> > > for improvements, the v side could be a 2 sided gerund for the {`}
> sides
> > > which could be for example {"1`}"1 or {L:0`}L:0
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you Raul and Aai for your help.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> > > To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> > > Cc:
> > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:50:48 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Amend trickiness part 2
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Pascal Jasmin <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >> I wanted to use the dyadic definition, but did not have
> > > >> a meaningful value for x, so I used ~ (giving the effect of y m} y).
> > > >
> > > > There seems to be a lot more going on there. There is already an x
> > > value of 1.
> > >
> > > Here?
> > >
> > > 1 3:`2:`]}~&.>@{`[`]} <"1 |: i. 5 3
> > >
> > > In this case, the ~ in the phrase 3:`2:`]}~&.>@... appears in the verb
> > > which is on the left side of an @
> > >
> > > And we always use the monadic definition of the verb on the left of
> the @
> > >
> > > So we use the monadic definition of 3:`2:`]}~&.> and so we use the
> > > monadic definition of 3:`2:`]}~
> > >
> > > (And the tilde means we use the dyadic definition of 3:`2:`]})
> > >
> > > That said, I should point out that there's something subtle going on
> > > here, with word boundaries:
> > >
> > > ;:'1 2 3: 4 5'
> > > +---+--+---+
> > > |1 2|3:|4 5|
> > > +---+--+---+
> > >
> > > > for instance with the value x of _3 _2 0 or 2, an answer is provided,
> > > > but item 1 of the middle cell is also modified. Other values of x
> > > > give various domain or index errors. If the '~' is removed, then x
> > > > values of 0 to 2, produce a middle cell of 6 to 8. I can't follow
> > > > what causes those results at all.
> > >
> > > The x that I think you are speaking of here is relevant for the verb
> > > on the right hand side of the @ so lets simplify the left hand side
> > > and play with the expression a bit:
> > >
> > > 1 <@0:@{`[`]} <"1 |: i. 5 3
> > > +----------+-+-----------+
> > > |0 3 6 9 12|0|2 5 8 11 14|
> > > +----------+-+-----------+
> > > _3 _2 0 <@0:@{`[`]} <"1 |: i. 5 3
> > > +-+-+-----------+
> > > |0|0|2 5 8 11 14|
> > > +-+-+-----------+
> > > 2 <@0:@{`[`]} <"1 |: i. 5 3
> > > +----------+-----------+-+
> > > |0 3 6 9 12|1 4 7 10 13|0|
> > > +----------+-----------+-+
> > >
> > > Note also that index _3 is (for this argument) the same as index 0.
> > >
> > > > Next I'm trying to change columns 1 and 4 row 2 to 3 and 'F', but I
> > > expect that to be harder.
> > >
> > > Well... I'm not quite sure what you want there, but let us assume that
> > > you want to change
> > >
> > > (<"1 &. |: i. 5 3), <'ABCDE'
> > > +----------+-----------+-----------+-----+
> > > |0 3 6 9 12|1 4 7 10 13|2 5 8 11 14|ABCDE|
> > > +----------+-----------+-----------+-----+
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > +----------+-----------+-----------+-----+
> > > |0 3 3 9 12|1 4 7 10 13|2 5 8 11 14|ABFDE|
> > > +----------+-----------+-----------+-----+
> > >
> > > if so, a phrase that would accomplish that would be:
> > >
> > > (3;7;8;'F') [`2:`]}&.> data
> > >
> > > Here, I've presumed that you are calling the contents of a box a
> > > "column" and that you are calling the location within a box a "row".
> > > I've also presumed that you have added 1 to the "column index" when
> > > you are speaking of "columns 1 and 4". I could easily be wrong,
> > > though, about your intentions. If so, let us know and we can try
> > > again?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Raul
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> │ │ │└─┴─┘│
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
