On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Don Kelly <d...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> And that's what this -@^.@rms bit is doing - finding that angle.
>
> What you have noted threw me (NB.root mean square)isn't that but is a root
> (sum of squares) -really a 'distance'.
> (on a plane for the white-black point fixed) between points - apparently
> angles in this case (although the original example gave
> a magnitude rather than an angle)

Yes.  That phrase "rms" was one I picked up in high school electronics
class. But wikipedia suggests that it has some general use:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square

> and you are then getting the log of 1/this distance.
> However, not having ground through your work (and maybe not yet competent
> enough in J to do so) I am missing a lot
> Is there a need to use -^. or -log rather than the raw "distance"?

Good question.

Experimenting: the - is necessary and the ^. is not necessary. (I do
not get a hexagon without the minus, I do get a hexagon without the
^.).

>> As for meaning - meaning is something we assign to observations.
>> Whether it's useful or not depends on our tastes and goals (and this
>> can involve a fair bit of experimentalism and thought sometimes).
>
> Agreed - and a curse/benefit of J is that there are so many different ways
> to handle a problem

It's not just J - this is a characteristic of mathematics and of human
thought. (And of other programming languages - though their
vocabularies facilitate different kinds of conversations.)

A nice thing about J is that some experiments become easy and it's
compact enough that conversations about code samples do not
necessarily require too much supporting effort..

Thanks,

-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to