I like this.  If this may one day be included in jhs itself, I would prefer the 
display were smaller, and that a line may be copied as plain text.

In terms of array display, probably the most useful feature would be 
distinguing between 1 6 $ i.6 and 6 $ i.6.


----- Original Message -----
From: robert therriault <bobtherria...@mac.com>
To: Programming forum <programm...@jsoftware.com>
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 10:28:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] problem matching boxed string

As a bit of a response to the whole question of what we see and what we get, I 
put together some html and css that allows a view of J results on JHS that 
gives type information implicitly in the display.

I think the blog post and demo video gives the flavour of the journey.

http://bobtherriault.wordpress.com/2014/02/02/using-html-and-css-to-view-types-in-the-jhs-platform-of-j/

Cheers, bob

On Jan 20, 2014, at 3:01 AM, Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Makes perfect sense now. The atom vs list distinction wasn't clicking
> earlier. I had become so used to working with arrays that everything
> became an array and I had completely forgotten about scalars.  The
> dictionary entry on nouns also covers it well,
> http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dicta.htm.
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>> The primitives, namely ;: u;.n u\ u\. u/.  produce lists even when there is
>> only one item in the partition.  Very regular.
> 
> 
> I understand better why it would do that now. As it partitions a list,
> it is likely simpler and performs better to create a list for each
> partition instead of determining whether there's only one item in the
> partition. I think of it as a splitting a char[] array into other
> char[] arrays instead of char for single and char[] otherwise.
> 
> 
>> There's just something special about a single character
>> or a single number: they are atoms.
> 
> This and the dictionary entry explains why $ 'a' or $ (<'abc') returns
> blank - since each are atoms.
> 
> Thanks again
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to