Thanks, Johann. I've corrected Atop and At. This was copied down incorrectly from the J Dictionary http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d620.htm ...which has the correct equivalence, and gives a neat example to verify it:
3 +:@- 7 is _8 (double the difference). There's a bulk-update in the pipeline, which will revert the correction, so it's good that you didn't alter it yourself without telling me. (But in future it will be okay to do so). On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Johann Hibschman <[email protected]>wrote: > I tried to log in and edit this, but I don't think I can. Currently, > NuVoc says u@:v is equivalent to: > > x u v y NB. dyad > > and u@v is equivalent to > > x (u"v) v y NB. dyad > > instead of (u x v y) and ((u"v) x v y), respectively. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
