The websocket demo works well and I can see a lot of potential with it.
Thank you! I also agree with Pascal that it would be useful to get
information about the connecting socket (e.g. originating IP address).  The
most basic security workaround is to add a firewall rule to prevent
connections on the port from outside interfaces. It might be helpful to be
able to bind to a specific IP/interface like a socket too.






On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Pascal Jasmin <godspiral2...@yahoo.ca>wrote:

> nodeJS calls the function remoteAddress, and pants calls it getpeername.
>
> In terms of "security already handled by websocket protocol", I can see a
> necessity for a user code authentication layer, but passwords might be
> compromised, and an IP could attempt millions of logins.  The millions of
> login attempts could be an intentional DOS event.  There is a simplicity to
> requiring 192.168.x.x IPs for "root" (privileged) user code access to
> server or simply any access.
>
> Running the demo for instance allows the world to execute ". on your
> machine. ?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com>
> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:48:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] QT websockets
>
> I think those low level functions are not part of websocket
> spec.  Security is already handled by websocket protocol.
>
> Since J is single thread, those globals will not cause any
> trouble. A handler can erase them if they are no longer used.
>
> Anyways, IMO, to compare socket with websocket is analogous
> to compre an apple with an pineapple.
>
> Пн, 10 фев 2014, Pascal Jasmin писал(а):
> > demos work fine. (and avast makes no complaints about the zip version of
> J8)
> >
> > I notice that sdgetpeername and sdgetsockname do not work on websockets
> (understandable if they are not sockets) and there is no QT equivalent for
> the functions.
> >
> > Is that something not implemented by QT, or not implemented by the J
> version?
> >
> > I can provide use cases, but the most obvious ones are centered around
> security and logging, authentication, and tunneling or calling back
> disconnected nodes based on IP addresses.
> >
> > I notice that wss0_jrx_ , wss1_jrx_ are "global" variables that persist
> through connect/disconnect (calls through handler).  Perhaps these
> parameters could be set to peer/sock name/IP for the onopen event, if a
> qtgetpeername/sockname is somehow difficult?
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> --
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to