Actually, I think that that was a different issue - I mis-interpreted a result I was getting, without adequate testing.
For now, }.attributes x should be replace by attributes x I will post another version later (or at least a reference to working code - this will be too much code for an email message before long). Thanks, and sorry about the mistake, -- Raul On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > One additional comment. > > I was using the idiom }. attributes x because when using the J6 version of > sax/xml there was an extraneous "attribute" row corresponding to the name > of the element. > > Under J8, I am not seeing this row, so I need to remove the }. because > that would cause me to not see the first attribute. > > FYI, > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
