Sorry, the error message was terse.
in fact it expected either 1 ro 2 arguments for send.
either "send socket" or "send socket data"

try this

  wd 'ws send ', (": sk) , ' hello'
or
  wd 'ws send ', (": sk) , ' "hello client, username:"'
or
  wd 'ws send ', (": sk) , ' *hello client, username:'

I guess the send in the demo should already use the * 

Пт, 14 фев 2014, Pascal Jasmin писал(а):
> Another issue I've uncovered in single application client and server 
> communication, also applies to separate applications.
> 
> It appears that the server receives the connect (onOpen) event first (before 
> client), but even though the server is connected, it is not safe for it to 
> send yet.
> 
> For instance, modifying the demo file:  \addons\ide\qt\demo.ijs
> 
> in the elseif jws_onOpen section of wssvr_handler , adding the line:
> smoutput 'serv connected'
> 
> wd 'ws send ', (": sk) , ' hello client, username:'
> 
> 
> (loading the file will also load a client web page app)
> 
> Hitting connect on the web app will display following message in console:
> 
> serv connected
> |ws : Need socket [data]: 73313136 hello client, username:: wd
> |   (wd ::(''"_)'qer')    (13!:8)3
> 
> The previous problem I was reporting was that the client sending "too fast" 
> caused no error on send, but a disconnect.  Here the server has been told its 
> connected, and has a socket number, but this weird error.   Some suggestions:
> 
> Perhaps the connect event could be delayed until the 2 sides are "really 
> connected" ?
> send should return _1 in above case?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to