I don't understand the source of this issue:

   1 2 -.@+./@:e.~ 3 3 3 4 1
1

   1 2 -.@:+./@:e.~ 3 3 3 4 1
1

   1 2 ([: -. +./@:e.~) 3 3 3 4 1
0

The 3rd one is the "correct" intention.  But I thought these were equivalent 
forms.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to