My naïve intuition is that a tree of symbols would be the most direct route
to increased performance. Would that fit with what you suggested here, Raul?
On Mar 3, 2014 1:52 AM, "Raul Miller" <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We should be able to concatenate boxed arrays with somewhat better
> performance. Conceptually speaking, the added box can be treated as an
> opaque string (other than reference counting bumps) for the purpose of the
> concatenation operation. Conceptually, also, already have some way of
> allocating memory in "power of two sized blocks". But memory management is
> a subtle thing, so maybe there is something I am missing?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:26 AM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would be quite happy if J can do that in a few minutes.  The
> > bottle neck is not string related but J converts Json data into a
> > box array. Because concatenation of box arrays cannot be done
> > in place, it re-constructs a new box array for each node and this
> > is quadratic.
> >
> > Even if you can use python to parse json, it will still take a
> > quadratic operation to convert that parsed data structure
> > back to a J box array. Untested.
> >
> > Пн, 03 мар 2014, June Kim (김창준) писал(а):
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I recently tried to work on a JSON file (a bookmark file from Chrome
> > > browser), which is about 28MB. My initial attempt was using the json
> > parser
> > > from the J packages. Oh, it was slow. It took more than one minute on
> my
> > > machine.
> > >
> > > Disappointed, but I was kind of expecting the slow performance because
> > > string and tree are not what J's strength is.
> > >
> > > Now I turned to Python and tried parsing the file using the standard
> > > package. Oh, I took about a second.
> > >
> > > So I can proceed with Python but I want to know if there are any other
> > > options working with J with better performance.
> > >
> > > June
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> > --
> > regards,
> > ====================================================
> > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to