On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> This has trouble when the numbers are close. > > 3 ((]*=) + - % ^.@:%) 3.000000000000001 > 5.66667 > 3 ((]*=!.0) + - % ^.@:%) 3.000000000000001 > 2.66667 > That's a good point. I didn't need =!.0 for the earlier version (which had the NaN problem when both args were 0) but the increased robustness of Roger's version looks like it wants a more exact form of equality. If I have time, I'll take a look at how stable this is over a wide range of values (and small epsilons). Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
