I am sending you directly the more up to date files in a separate email.

I am doubtful about fixing the javascript code alone because of the very
convincing and long answer given by @gman.

Thanks for the heads up regarding the bad link. I have fixed that.

My imagination of a solution to this problem via J is to have function
ev_command_enter_ajax(elements) send a fake event back to j. That fake
event would contain a revised version of its argument "elements" that could
be sent right back to javascript after the desired delay. The revision
would behead the list of movement items and decrease the value of NUMBER
embedded in it, before sending off the fake event. But the problem with
that approach may be exactly what you are warning me about regarding
browser security issues? I had not known about that.


On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> A big issue with jhs is browser security. The browser has to deal with
> every advertiser in the world wanting to get control of it. So web browsers
> are somewhat selective about what they will retrieve. More specifically: it
> will not accept anything from the web server except in response to a
> request to that server. And that's something you are going to need to be
> conscious of here.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
>
>

-- 
(B=) <-----my sig
Brian Schott
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to