try func3=. [:(3&+) 2&- or func4=.3+2&- I've been caught by the hook in the past.
Don Kelly+ On 30/04/2014 8:42 AM, Jon Hough wrote:
I can't understand why func1 =. 3&+ @: (2&-) func2 =. (3&+) (2&-) give different results as mondaic verbs. func1 5 gives 0, which is what I would expect. func2 5 gives 12, which I can't understand. I would like to know what the difference is between func1 and func2. It is my understanding that for monadic verbs @: is optional, so doesn't add anything to the meaning of the whole verb. Regards. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
