As luck would have it, we can't help but avoid Project Euler; it's
gone off-line sine die, with "a security issue", as posted at
http://projecteuler.net/
Their forum is still up: http://forum.projecteuler.net/
It looks as if they're taking significantly longer than one minute to
solve this one.
Mike
On 16/06/2014 00:39, Raul Miller wrote:
I generally avoid project euler, because I do not like working under its
constraint on disclosure. So I'm pleased when something leaks out that I
can play with. But I also try to live within the implied spirit of the
contest, so I'm not going to release my code.
Still: a quick calculation suggests that J's floating point representation
is adequate for this problem (and gives a 30x speed improvement over use of
rationals). Also, a trivial approach seems plenty adequate here
Thanks,
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3964/7685 - Release Date: 06/16/14
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
