Erling wrote: "It's obviously not possible to do any amendments in tacit
code?" Adding after wards: "A principle of functional programming is you
never modify a variable?"
From my perspective those (rhetorical?) questions are separate. Regarding
the first question, consider the verb (v) that produces the squares of an
amendment produced by the verb amend. For example,
( v=. *: @: amend f. )
*:@:(_: 0&({::)@]`(1&({::)@])`(2&({::)@])} ])
v (0 1 2 ; 2 3 5 ; 7#9)
81 81 0 1 81 4 81
The verb (v) is tacitly defined (is it not?) and amendment is performed via
} (is it not?); thus the answer to the first question is that it is
possible. Furthermore, the conclusion is reached regardless of what the
meanings of “functional programming” and “variable” might, or might not,
be. (Am I missing something?).
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Yes, what I said is it seems like a misnomer. Functional J has variables,
> but they are handled by the interpreter? Still they are never changed? This
> could create a performance problem if you do a lot of small changes to big
> data structures? It is essential to handle this efficiently? Still J does
> not have lazy execution? The functional transformations Amend does are
> immediately executed? Maybe J sometimes only creates new pointers to old
> static data structures? /Erling
>
>
> On 2014-07-08 00:21, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
>
>> What variable? Tacit programming does not refer to any arguments
>> explicitly; or, are you saying that “amend” is a misnomer (if so, that is
>> not my domain)?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> A principle of functional programming is you never modify a variable?
>>> What
>>> Amend does is create a new variable from other existing variables?
>>> Nothing
>>> is amended? /Erling
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-07-07 23:50, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
>>>
>>> Erling wrote:
>>>> "
>>>> It's obviously not possible to do any amendments in tacit code? It is
>>>> also
>>>> less elegant to pass these three parameters in the two arguments in
>>>> tacit
>>>> code?
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> Well, Raul and I showed general verbs to perform amendments tacitly.
>>>> Once
>>>> I was as puzzled as you are (were?) but I found enlightenment; maybe you
>>>> can find it as well:
>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2000-September/004192.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Erling Hellenäs <
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's obviously not possible to do any amendments in tacit code? It is
>>>>
>>>>> also
>>>>> less elegant to pass these three parameters in the two arguments in
>>>>> tacit
>>>>> code? Any opinions about the use of From to do the same thing?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> NB. x and y are arrays of the same rank
>>>>> NB. q is a boolean, also of this rank
>>>>> NB. The expression merges x and y.
>>>>> NB. Where q is TRUE it picks from y, otherwise x
>>>>> NB. q {"0 1 x,"0 y
>>>>>
>>>>> If q is a vector and if we actually have a variable z of rank
>>>>> (+/q),}.$y
>>>>> we can easily create x from q#^:_1 [ z ? No use for any indexes?
>>>>>
>>>>> /Erling
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ----------
>>>>>
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
