Hi Erling,

I agree with your assessment for what I think of as production code that will 
be used by third party users. In the case of Raul's reference, I think of it 
more as proof of concept coding. The goal in this case is to create a work that 
can act as a prototype. If it is useful, then steps must be taken to clean it 
up and make it maintainable (but first it needs to work). I see that as one of 
the big differences in the ways that I code, which is more of a bricolage 
approach, and the coding of programmers who create production code.

Cheers, bob

On Jul 15, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]> wrote:

> Programs tend to have users? When the programmer is finished he leaves? After 
> a while someone is supposed to maintain 5 millions lines of code? Fix bugs 
> and make needed changes? Wake up, if you write a decent program it's used for 
> ages, and you're not there to explain it. It must be documented? The code 
> must be self-explanatory? /Erling
> 
> On 2014-07-15 16:58, Raul Miller wrote:
>> Here's an excellent writeup that I think is relevant in the context of
>> readability:
>> 
>> http://prog21.dadgum.com/87.html
>> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to