How about "split":
{. ,&< }.
?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Alex Giannakopoulos <
aeg...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> I suppose the most useful, from a beginner's point of view, is the cap
> fork, e.g.
> [: *: sin
> which allows composition, and is equivalent to
> *: @ sin
> Some people prefer this former notation as clearer than the latter.
>
> So,
> sin =: 1&o.
> cos =: 2&o.
> (([: *: sin) + [: *: cos) 9876543210
> 1
>
> Basically, a handy notation for anywhere that a dyadic operator acts on two
> others (if these others are monadic then the fork is monadic, if dyadic
> then fork is dyadic)
>
> Also check this
> 4 ([+[*]) 5 NB. two forks ([ + ([*]))
> 24
>
>
>
>
>
> On 16 July 2014 21:26, 'Dan Baronet' via Programming <
> programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> > I am looking for good examples of use of trains.
> > Apart from the classic +/ % #, I can't think of many more.
> > Anyone with some examples? They can be of any length.
> > /Dan
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
--
Devon McCormick, CFA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
