That was my original impression.

But then I looked at the right hand side of the expression:

Why is it labelled x,y,:z and why does the text mention the case
c}x,y,...,:z?

It might be that this was originally a more ambitious project and that
Roger got interrupted before he finished it.

Anyways, it is interesting to me that the wiki page is silent about this
explicitly documented issue.

-- 
Raul



On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:

> 'boolean' here means that 3!:0 returns 1; the values are restricted to
> {0,1}.  Details at
>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/SpecialCombinations#
> Assignments_In_Place_.28AIP.29
>
>
> Henry Rich
>
>
> On 8/7/2014 8:42 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
>
>> I think http://jsoftware.com/help/release/iamend.htm might be relevant.
>>
>> Note also that in this case I'm not sure if "boolean" really means
>> "non-negative integer". (If I understand properly: in George Boole's
>> arithmetic these were equivalent, and some of the details here suggest
>> that
>> that original meaning might be relevant here. It's a confusing topic
>> though
>> because it has become popular, depending on context, to assert that
>> "boolean" can only refer to the values 0 and 1 and also that "boolean"
>> cannot be used to refer to the values 0 and 1.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to