On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:56 PM, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Isn't it more useful to produce a keyed table of cumulative
> frequencies?
> eg:
> (~.,.(((%{:)@:(+/\)))@:(#/.~))2 2 2 4 4 6 6 8
Thank you. The keyed table is useful, but ultimately I need to merge
into the rows of the source table. I'll be running queries like -- get
all rows > 0.95 or < 0.05 in which case I will want the source table
with the frequencies as a new column
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
