I guess the issue here is: what problem would this solve? (There's a generic problem with solving tautological problems. So it's good to have some larger situation in mind, to avoid cluttering up the language with overspecialized forms of generality.)
Thanks, -- Raul On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:44 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming < [email protected]> wrote: > It is a domain error to place the fit conjunction elsewhere. Perhaps a > useful language enhancement would be that fit is defined for arbitrary > verbs outside of the "whitelist" to be fill? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Raul Miller <[email protected]> > To: Programming forum <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:38:07 PM > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] fit conjunction > > The 0 comes from the derived verb, not from # > > Thus: > > 2#^:|"+ 1 2 3 > 1 1 > 2 0 > 3 3 > 2(1+#^:|)"+ 1 2 3 > 2 2 > 3 0 > 4 4 > > So you'll have to synthesize the _ on your own. Perhaps something like > this: > > (+_*_1&=)<:2(1+#^:|)"+ 1 2 3 > 1 1 > 2 _ > 3 3 > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:21 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > (2#(!._)])^:(2|])"0 ] 1 2 3 > > 1 1 > > 2 0 > > 3 3 > > > > the fit conjunction here has no effect, is there a way to get the 0 fill > > to be replaced with _ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
