Correction:

I see five different ways of using a single pair of parenthesis to separate
the 3 and the 169.

(I believed there was a fifth way but I needed to eat breakfast before I
could think clearly enough to see it.)

Can you find them all?

Thanks,

-- 
Raul



On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just so it's clear what has happened here:
>
>    ;:'SumOfFact^:3 169'
> +---------+--+-----+
> |SumOfFact|^:|3 169|
> +---------+--+-----+
>
> In other words, 3 169 is a single word. It's a word that happens to have a
> space in it, but that's actually not at all unusual. Here's another example
> of a word with a space in it:
>
>    'this is a test'
>
> Actually, that particular word has three spaces in it. But that counts,
> right?
>
> Note that some people prefer to call words "tokens" for various reasons.
>
> Note also that we train our eyes to see these things. To someone who has
> never studied computer programming languages, 'this is a test' might look
> like four words where two of them contain apostrophes. But someone familiar
> with quoting rules can see it as a single "thing" and - if they've played
> with implementations of parsers or similar things - they'll have an idea
> about why it's worth calling this thing a "word" or a "token".
>
> Anyways, I have had this happen to me relatively often, so I am familiar
> with its symptoms. I'll have a J sentence which uses a number and I will
> add another number to it, and I will want it to be a different word, and I
> have to remind myself to make it be one.
>
> Meanwhile some other messages have provided some examples of how to break
> 3 169 into two separate words, so I'll skip that part. But I'll note that I
> see four different ways of using a single pair of parenthesis to accomplish
> this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:55 PM, alessandro codenotti <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I'm working on PE#74, which asks for the sum of the factorials of the
> digits in a number
> > (i.e. if the number is 169 then it asks for 1!+6!+9!).
> >
> > I wrote this verb that performs the required operation:
> > SumOfFact=: 3 : 0
> >      +/!"."0@": y
> > )
> > It works perfectly, but now I need to reiterate it to produce a chain
> like 169 -> 363601 -> 1454 -> 169,so I tried:
> > SumOfFact^:3 169
> >
> > But instead of working as I hoped it simply writes "SumOfFact^:3 169" as
> output.
> >
> > What am I doing wrong and how am I supposed to repeatedly apply a verb
> to an argument?
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to