It's just backwards compatibility, but a lot of the standard scripts
rely on it, and someone would have to do a bit of work to allow the
feature to be removed.
Henry Rich
On 10/8/2014 6:20 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
I think you want http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d310n.htm
Especially points 4 and 5.
But I actually haven't found anything that suggests that x and y are
analogs for u and v when u and v are not used. I think that might be pure
backwards compatibility (which suggests it should be treated in am manner
analogous to 9!:48 and 9!:49).
Thanks,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
