Thanks. Yes when I'm explaining multiplication to elementary students in Grade 3. Actually as a "math" type I use it almost exclusively and only look at the tacit version rarely.
Linda -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Devon McCormick Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:22 AM To: J-programming forum Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Need help going from tacit to direct definitionI want to write gg in direct definition as g=: 13 :: Do you find the "13 : ..." form clearer than tacit? In any case, this should do the trick: 13 : '(<"1 y)$&.><<'' ''' (<<' ') $&.>~ <"1 (((<<' ') $&.>~ <"1) -: gg) A 1 On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Linda Alvord <[email protected]> wrote: > I want to write gg in direct definition as g=: 13 :: > > > > f=: 13 :'(>:i.x),"0 / >:i.y' > > A=:3 f 4 > > gg=:([: < (<' ') $~ ])"1 > > gg A > > ----T-----T-------T---------┐ > │--┐│--T-┐│--T-T-┐│--T-T-T-┐│ > ││ │││ │ │││ │ │ │││ │ │ │ ││ > │L--│L-+--│L-+-+--│L-+-+-+--│ > +---+-----+-------+---------+ > │--┐│--T-┐│--T-T-┐│--T-T-T-┐│ > ││ │││ │ │││ │ │ │││ │ │ │ ││ > │+-+│+-+-+│+-+-+-+│+-+-+-+-+│ > ││ │││ │ │││ │ │ │││ │ │ │ ││ > │L--│L-+--│L-+-+--│L-+-+-+--│ > +---+-----+-------+---------+ > │--┐│--T-┐│--T-T-┐│--T-T-T-┐│ > ││ │││ │ │││ │ │ │││ │ │ │ ││ > │+-+│+-+-+│+-+-+-+│+-+-+-+-+│ > ││ │││ │ │││ │ │ │││ │ │ │ ││ > │+-+│+-+-+│+-+-+-+│+-+-+-+-+│ > ││ │││ │ │││ │ │ │││ │ │ │ ││ > │L--│L-+--│L-+-+--│L-+-+-+--│ > L---+-----+-------+---------- > > > > Linda > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- Devon McCormick, CFA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
