I took a quick look at it.

I do not think lassign is very meaningful. I can think of uses for it,
but they seem obscure.

Meanwhile, I am also not clear on the difference between 'in' and
'of'. (They behave the same on my simple tests, and there's a lot of
code to wade through, here.

I don't suppose you feel like putting together a ref doc (for example:
one sentence descriptions on the important words, along with
representative sample data)? The test scripts look promising, though,
so maybe I'll discover what I need there...

Thanks,

-- 
Raul

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:36 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
<[email protected]> wrote:
> https://github.com/Pascal-J/type-system-j
>
>
> This is actually the type system I'd like any language to have.  Its much 
> cleaner than class-based user defined types in that you don't need to define 
> casting function into and out of classes.
>
> This may be a bit hard for beginners in that to fully use with explicit 
> multiline code, the user needs to understand how 3 : 0 can be part of a 
> fuller line.  But its both powerful to create types, and easy enough for me 
> to consume them.
>
> Some unique powerful features are compound types, parameterized types, and 
> inputwide (record/array vs field) validation (type)s.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to