You have not told us your JVERSION or other system details, so that I have
no idea why Qt did not work for you.  If Qt is available and you got enough
ram, I suspect decoding a MB jpeg will only take well less than 1 second,
as Raul had witnessed.
​For the size of file with which I typically deal - nominally 20 MB (5472 x
3648 pixel pictures​) - it took about 5 hours to read one image.  I'm
looking to do better than this by a factor of 1000.  I'll take a look at
the pure J approach to get an idea if this is feasible.

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:41 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:

> I made a patch to accept both APP0 and APP1, but did not attempt
> to process any APP1 specific tags. That said, szies of jpeg from
> DC or mobile phones are typically a few MB. It may take many
> hours to decode with pure J if Qt is unavailable.
>
> Вс, 19 апр 2015, Raul Miller написал(а):
> > Oh, yeah... I was just reading about that the other day:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_File_Interchange_Format#Compatibility
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG#JPEG_files
> >
> > http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/JPEG#Portability
> >
> > But then I got bogged down in the details of the huffman coding and
never
> > really did get around to figuring out anything that might be useful for
> > decoding the APP1 stuff that cameras tend to emit.
> >
> > It might be interesting, though, to take a look at one of these files
and
> > figure out at least enough of what they are doing to figure out how to
> make
> > the readjpeg code happy.
> >
> > But without an example to work from, I useful progress might be
> difficult.
> > Everything I read suggests that jpeg is not so much a standard as a
bunch
> > of slightly incompatible standards with ad-hoc practices that tend to
> work
> > but which necessarily do things outside the scope of the standards.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Raul
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 8:22 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I think isjpeg checked for APP0 marker (JFIF -: 74 70 73 70 {a.)
> > > > http://www.fileformat.info/format/jpeg/egff.htm
> > >
> > > Apparently your jpeg use APP1 instead. (Exif -: 69 120 105
> > > 102{a.) which pure J jpeg decoder does not support.
> > >
> > > Anyways I guess Qt should be capable of handling all these formats.
> > > On Apr 20, 2015 7:35 AM, "Devon McCormick" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is my kluge to accommodate the header my .jpgs have:
> > > >
> > > > isJpeg0_jjpeg_=: 4 : 0
> > > >    *./ +./x +./ . = 0 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 { a.&i.^:(2=3!:0) 11{.y
> > > > )
> > > > isJpeg_jjpeg_=: (255 216 255 224 74 70 73 70 0,:255 216 255 225 69
> 120
> > > 105
> > > > 102 0)&isJpeg0_jjpeg_
> > > >
> > > > The imagemagick idea is no good - I'm dealing w/hundreds of files
> per day
> > > > and have a nice J process that was working well w/.jpgs until the
> attempt
> > > > to move to J8 broke it.  I may have to go back to the old,
> unsupported
> > > > methods.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 6:38 PM, bill lam <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Please provide details how it failed to detect a vaild jpeg file,
> eg
> > > > which
> > > > > 9 bytes it read and what should be the 11 bytes.
> > > > >
> > > > > jpeg addon should automatically use Qt if available. Otherwise it
> use
> > > > pure
> > > > > J scripts.
> > > > >
> > > > > You could also use platimg or image3 addons of J602, however they
> are
> > > no
> > > > > longer maintained.
> > > > > On Apr 20, 2015 3:26 AM, "Devon McCormick" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > All -
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I find my efforts to move fully onto J8 stymied by the
inadequate
> > > > support
> > > > > > for .JPG image files in the  jpeg addon.  When I attempt to read
> a
> > > > valid
> > > > > > file that can be read properly by at least 2 other applications,
> I
> > > get
> > > > > the
> > > > > > error "invalid JPEG file".  The proximate cause of this error is
> a
> > > zero
> > > > > > returned by "isJpeg" which is checking for 9 of the first 11
> bytes of
> > > > my
> > > > > > file to have specific values.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can kluge this to accept the headers of the files it's
> currently
> > > > > > rejecting but, in any case, this version of "readjpeg" is
> > > > excruciatingly
> > > > > > slow: it takes about 30 seconds to read in a file that's well
> under
> > > > 300K.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone have any ideas for alternatives to the existing J8
> jpeg
> > > > > > reader?  I'd prefer not to continue to use the old J7 gtk-based
> ones
> > > > but
> > > > > > see no other way for now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Devon
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Devon McCormick, CFA
> > > > > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > For information about J forums see
> > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Devon McCormick, CFA
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> --
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



--
Devon McCormick, CFA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to