Hmm... but what should the effect be when the verbs in the gerund are
not rank zero?

-- 
Raul


On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, I've done that too.
>
> The point is that there are ways to get a constant verb (or one could be
> defined), but no easy way to get the effect of +`-"n .
>
> Henry Rich
>
>
> On 8/9/2015 4:00 PM, Marshall Lochbaum wrote:
>>
>> I've used (0"0) a few times to make an empty array a given shape
>> (usually followed by an invocation of }). However, (0$~$) is not much
>> longer and I find that it better explains what I am trying to do.
>>
>> Marshall
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 02:45:11PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> Conciseness?
>>>
>>> I guess it's debatable whether constants with non-infinite rank are
>>> more or less common than gerunds which need to conform to the shape of
>>> their (eventual) verb argument.
>>>
>>> Perhaps it would be worthwhile collecting useful examples of each? I
>>> know I've used low-rank constants within the last few years, but at
>>> the moment I do not remember where...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Raul
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jose Mario Quintana
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A constant verb (with rank _) can be produced easily via &[.  For
>>>> example,
>>>>
>>>>     (1 2 3 &[) _
>>>> 1 2 3
>>>>
>>>> and it could be followed by a suitable rank (") form if necessary.  Am I
>>>> missing something?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All the partitioning modifiers (\ /. \. ;. etc) allow u to be a gerund
>>>>> that is applied cyclically to the partitions.  Thus, +`-/. applies +
>>>>> and -
>>>>> alternately.
>>>>>
>>>>> All the modifiers, that is, except one.  The simplest one.  One that
>>>>> perhaps wasn't thought of as partitioning, though it clearly does.  It
>>>>> partitions the y argument into cells.
>>>>>
>>>>> If m"n had been defined consistently with the other partitioning
>>>>> modifiers, we would be able to write +`-"_1 to have different verbs
>>>>> applied
>>>>> to items.  This would have saved dozens of emails over the years
>>>>> searching
>>>>> for a good way to perform this often-needed operation.
>>>>>
>>>>> The constant-verb would have to move somewhere else: m&n, m@n, and many
>>>>> other places are free.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the next language.
>>>>>
>>>>> Henry Rich
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to