I use Courier for nouns, and I want a different font for verbs. If you (or anyone else) can suggest a font that is

 - easily distinguishable from Courier
 - available on all machines, including Mac

I'll use it.

Henry Rich

On 9/26/2015 11:05 PM, 'Jon Hough' via Programming wrote:
These are all great, thanks.

By the way, off-topic, in dissect it might be a good idea to use Courier or a 
typeface with serifs. It is very easy to misread I. as |., at least for me.
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 9/27/15, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:

  Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Generate Complete Graphs
  To: programm...@jsoftware.com
  Date: Sunday, September 27, 2015, 11:21 AM
Yes, that's very
  pretty.
Henry Rich On 9/26/2015 10:08 PM, Linda A
  Alvord wrote:
  > Or:
  >
  > 5
  5#:I.,</~i.5
  > 0 1
  > 0 2
  > 0 3
  > 0 4
  > 1 2
  > 1 3
  > 1 4
  > 2 3
  > 2 4
  > 3 4
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
  > [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com]
  On Behalf Of Raul Miller
  > Sent:
  Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:52 PM
  >
  To: Programming forum
  > Subject: Re:
  [Jprogramming] Generate Complete Graphs
  >
  > Another variation
  might be:
  >
  >
     require'stats'
  >
     complete=: 2&comb
  >
  > That said, here's an illustration of
  why it can be easy to calculate:
  >
     -.+/\=i.5
  > 0 1 1 1 1
  > 0 0 1 1 1
  > 0 0 0 1
  1
  > 0 0 0 0 1
  > 0 0 0
  0 0
  >
  >
     5 5 #:I.,-.+/\=i.5
  > 0 1
  > 0 2
  > 0 3
  > 0 4
  > 1 2
  > 1 3
  > 1 4
  > 2 3
  > 2 4
  > 3 4
  >
  > Making that concise and tacit will change
  its form, but hopefully the
  > underlying
  concept is clear?
  >
  >
  Thanks,
  >
  > --
  > Raul
  >
  > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Linda A
  Alvord <lindaalv...@verizon.net>
  > wrote:
  >> Enter
  "comb" to see the tacit version of my verb:
  >>
  >> comb
  >> ([ = [: +/"1 [: #: [: i. 2 ^ ])
  ([: |. [: I. #) [: #: [: i. 2 ^ ]
  >>
  >> Linda
  >>
  >> -----Original
  Message-----
  >> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
  >> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com]
  On Behalf Of Linda A
  >> Alvord
  >> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015
  11:48 AM
  >> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
  >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Generate
  Complete Graphs
  >>
  >> comb=: 13 :'(x=+/"1 #:i.2^y)
  ([:|.[:I.#) #:i.2^y'
  >>
     2 comb 5
  >> 0 1
  >> 0 2
  >> 0 3
  >> 0 4
  >> 1 2
  >> 1 3
  >> 1 4
  >> 2 3
  >> 2 4
  >> 3 4
  >>
  >>     3 comb 4
  >> 0 1 2
  >> 0 1
  3
  >> 0 2 3
  >> 1
  2 3
  >>
  >>
  >> -----Original Message-----
  >> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
  >> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com]
  On Behalf Of Henry
  >> Rich
  >> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015
  11:12 AM
  >> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
  >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Generate
  Complete Graphs
  >>
  >> ; <@({. ,. }.)\.@i. 5
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> (#~
  </"1) (#: i.@(*/)) 2 $ 5
  >>
  >> Henry Rich
  >>
  >> On 9/26/2015 9:24 AM, 'Jon
  Hough' via Programming wrote:
  >>> Sorry, the second verb should
  be
  >>>
  >>>
  getEdges =: 3 : 0
  >>> if. 1 > #
  y do.
  >>>
  >>> else.
  >>>
  h =. 1{.y
  >>> t =. 1}.y
  >>> ((h&,)"0 t ), getEdges
  t
  >>> end.
  >>> )
  >>>
  >>> (changed getNodes to getEdges)
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  --------------------------------------------
  >>> On Sat, 9/26/15, 'Jon
  Hough' via Programming
  >>>
  <programm...@jsoftware.com>
  >> wrote:
  >>>
    Subject: [Jprogramming] Generate Complete Graphs
  >>>    To: "Programming
  Forum" <programm...@jsoftware.com>
  >>>    Date: Saturday, September 26,
  2015, 10:16 PM
  >>>
  >>>    I have a couple of verbs to
  represent
  >>>    a complete
  (undirected) graph as a list of edges. Clearly
  >>>    there are "N choose
  2" edges that need to be generated. This
  >>>    is my code
  >>>
  >>>
  complete =: 3 : 0
  >>>    nodes =.
  i. y
  >>>    getEdges nodes
  >>>    )
  >>>
  >>>
  getEdges =: 3 : 0
  >>>    if. 1
  > # y do.
  >>>
  >>>    else.
  >>>    h =. 1{.y
  >>>    t =. 1}.y
  >>>    ((h&,)"0 t ),
  getNodes t
  >>>    end.
  >>>    )
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>    e.g. I can get the 10 edges
  of the graph K5 by doing
  >>>
  >>>    complete 5
  >>>
  >>>
  My above code is ugly however. To be specific, it seems
  too
  >>>    imperative for J,
  and the first part of the if. do. in
  >>>    getEdges doesn't return
  anything which seems ugly.
  >>>
  >>>    I would like to know if there
  is a more J-like, terse way to
  >>>    do this.
  >>>
  >>>
  Regards,
  >>>    Jon
  >>>
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  >>>    For information about J
  forums see
  >>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  >>>
  >>>
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  >>> - For information about J forums
  see
  >>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  >>>
  >>
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  >>
  >>
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  >>
  >>
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  >
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  >
  >
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  >
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to