You could write out pertinent data to a file before ending the J session to
read back in when you run jconsole again.

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> > You should think of each terminal command line as simulating a separate
> run of the program you are modeling.
>
> That is my understanding too. Therefore I guess the only way I can
> communicate sensibly via Terminal with a daemon listening on a port is
> via something like netcat. As per your example, or one of the examples
> given by: man nc. This is precisely where the usage of NSTask is hazy
> to me, and the documentation doesn't seem to help (or else I can't
> read it properly). I'm going to look for more sample code.
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> However I don't yet know how to converse via NSTask with a daemon
> >> through a port. I need to find a tame daemon that will talk to me
> >> nicely via Mac Terminal, which I can then try to handle via NSTask.
> >> Then I'll feel more confident about conversing with a long-running
> >> jconsole process.
> >
> > I think you have conflicting (internally inconsistent) requirements here.
> >
> > You should think of each terminal command line as simulating a
> > separate run of the program you are modeling.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Raul
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to