Amen

-----Original Message-----
From: Programming [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of bill lam
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 12:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Definition: Frame of an argument

The J dictionary is always correct.

Пт, 15 янв 2016, Matthew Baulch написал(а):
> Fair enough, though I can't work out whether the dictionary agrees 
> with NuVoc here or not. Either way, which definition of frame is correct?
> On 15 Jan 2016 3:48 pm, "bill lam" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > For J implemention, the only authority is the J dictionary since it 
> > defines the J language.  You need not worry anything else.
> >
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dictb.htm
> >
> > Пт, 15 янв 2016, Matthew Baulch написал(а):
> > > I assume the intended definition of 'frame', in relation to verb
> > arguments,
> > > is that given on
> > >
> > > http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/FramingFill
> > >
> > > I'm just trying to understand verb/argument combinations with 
> > > empty frame--the most common case, I suppose.
> > >
> > > From the wording "each argument is ... an array of [r-cells]. The 
> > > frame
> > ...
> > > is the shape of this array of [r-cells]", it seems that a frame 
> > > should never be empty, but in fact have a minimum shape of '1'. Of 
> > > course, this ties into the wording of many other statements. In 
> > > the case of dyadic verbs, for instance,
> > >
> > > "frames must agree ... they must be identical or one must be a 
> > > prefix of the other" (stated in link above)
> > >
> > > as opposed to
> > >
> > > "frames must agree ... one must have shape 1 or be a prefix of the other"
> > > (the way I see it, assuming equality implies prefix-of)
> > >
> > > Can anyone shed some light on this? Is there an important reason 
> > > for this convention that I'm missing, or is it of little consequence?
> > >
> > > I'm implementing (or trying to...) a subset of J for the JVM, and 
> > > this is one little detail that's bothering me.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Matt Baulch
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---- For information about J forums see 
> > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> > --
> > regards,
> > ====================================================
> > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 gpg --keyserver 
> > subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -- For information about J forums see 
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

--
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 gpg --keyserver 
subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to