Of course, thanks
On 2/23/2016 9:39 AM, Roger Hui wrote:
A gerund is a noun, so in +`*`-`- i. 33 it's more accurate to say that
i. is applied to the gerund and 33 rather than the gerund is applied to i.
, and an easier explanation of why the result is 4.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Cliff Reiter <[email protected]> wrote:
I think the first time I saw gerund insert, Ken Iverson showed off
+`%/10# 1x
13r8
getting Fibonacci approximations to the Golden ratio, so I always expected
it to be "from the front".
Seeing this thread, I decided to experiment but forgot to "insert" and got
something unexpected:
+`* i.3
2
+`* 0 1 2
|syntax error
| +`*0 1 2
+`* i.33
2
+`*`-`- i.33
4
Gerund applied to i. gives the length of the gerund?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm