Let us consider yet one more twist, courtesy of Dan, to the Exercise 1
variant (a1x0 described below); that is, produce, say a1x1 without
involving either /, &, &:, @, @:, &., &.:, @. or `:6 such that for
arbitrary but specific u and N,
( (u a1)N ) -: ( (u a1x1)N ),
for example,
* a1x1 2 3 5 7
14
(1 + %) a1x1 3 5 7 9
1.33333333
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Let us add another twist, courtesy of David Lambert, to the Exercise 1:
>
> Produce a variant of a1, say a1x0 without involving either @. or `:6
> such that for arbitrary but specific u and N,
>
> ( (u a1)N ) -: ( (u a1x0)N ),
>
> for example,
>
> * a1x0 2 3 5 7
> 14
> (1 + %) a1x0 3 5 7 9
> 1.33333333
>
> Clarification (just in case): No one is recommending to use any solutions
> for a1x0 vs other solutions for a1; this is meant to be a puzzle.
>
> P.S. Remember to show spoiler alerts. It is ease to forget; believe me,
> I know :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Right, so let us add a twist to the Exercise 1:
>>
>> Minor alert for anyone that have not seen Pascal's solution for a1...
>>
>> 7
>> 6
>> 5
>> 4
>> 3
>> 2
>> 1
>> 0
>>
>> Produce a1 without involving @. in the code.
>>
>> Remember: "Spoiler alerts by instructors and patrons will be
>> appreciated."
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:43 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Pascal Jasmin wrote:
>>> > a0 =:
>>> > a1 =:
>>>
>>> You are confusing the Jym with the Spoilarium, I'm afraid.
>>>
>>> Martin Neitzel
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>>
>>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
