I think you will. It's a bit forbidding at first, with very little in the
way of commentary to guide you. When I want to understand an area, I first
go through and add explanatory notes. If many users did that, we could make
the code much more welcoming to newcomers.
AFAICS, any stack information you have when debug is off is accidental.
There has to be some rudimentary stack to allow formatting of error
messages, but it represents wasted time in the interpreter and should be
reduced to the minimum possible.
Henry Rich
On 6/3/2016 6:23 PM, Don Guinn wrote:
No. It is a very useful debugging tool. I want to verify that it works
properly with debug off. My job. It will take me a while as I have avoided
really looking at the source. But I knew that sooner or later I would. And
I'll probably have fun doing it.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
You could add that to the bug list.
Henry Rich
On 6/2/2016 1:46 PM, Don Guinn wrote:
Then it should raise an error if debug is off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
