There is, of course, a tacit "dyad."  See below, ...















   1 2 3 ((Cloak ]&.:train ;:'&o.')&.>@:[      (train@([ ; an)f."0)
o.@:(%&3)@])
 0.25 0.5 0.75
0.258819 0.866025 1

or, if you prefer,

   1 2 3 ((Cloak ]&.:train ;:'&o.')&.>@:[ (,.@:(train@([ ; an)f."0))
o.@:(%&3)@])
 0.25 0.5 0.75
0.258819
0.866025
       1

By the way, both verbs are fixed.


On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:25 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming <
[email protected]> wrote:

> text at bottom for spoilers
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Adverbial Tacit Jym
>
> Spoiler
>
> a
> s
>
> a
>
> v
> e
> r
> b
>
> eval =: 1 : ' a: 1 : m'
>
> aar =: 1 : 'if. (0=4!:0 ::0:)@:< ''u'' do. if. (2 = 3!:0) m do. q =. m
> eval else. q =. u end. else. q =. u end. 5!:1 < ''q'' '
>
>
> Cloak=: aar(0:`)(,^:)
>
> 'and or rotate shift signedshift'=.  ('b.' Cloak each) 17 23 32 33 34
>
>
> A very cool thing about Cloak is that the "verbified modifiers" can return
> non nouns, and can box non-noun return values, and =:/=. works
> automagically.  ("0 doesn't work though)
>
>
> Can even do this:
>
>
>   '/'Cloak each  ('b.' Cloak each) 17 23 32 33 34
> ┌──────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬──────┐
> │17 b./│23 b./│32 b./│33 b./│34 b./│
> └──────┴──────┴──────┴──────┴──────┘
>
> (alternate)
>
> '/'Cloak @('b.' Cloak) each 17 23 32 33 34
>
> That format is neither lr nor ar, but they are "real verbs"
>
> 0 {:: '/'Cloak @('b.' Cloak) each (17 23 32 33 34) 1 1
> 1
>
> an improvement over your/Dan's original Cloak is that you can Cloak an
> adverb train, and its clean enough to use anonymously.  IMO, its easier to
> read if there
>
>
>   ('/\'Cloak) @('b.' Cloak) each (17 23 32 33 34)
> ┌───────┬───────┬───────┬───────┬───────┐
> │17 b./\│23 b./\│32 b./\│33 b./\│34 b./\│
> └───────┴───────┴───────┴───────┴───────┘
>   '&o.' Cloak each 1 2 3
> ┌────┬────┬────┐
> │1&o.│2&o.│3&o.│
> └────┴────┴────┘
>
> non cloacked verbs still work with "this data", and `:6 works but `:0
> doesn't.
>
> ar =: 1 : '5!:1 <''u'''
>
> insN =: }:@:,@:([`([ $~ <.&#)@.(>&#) ,.~&>/@:(,&< $~&.> >.&#) ])
>
> (, ar insN '/'Cloak @('b.' Cloak) each (17 23 32 33 34) )(`:6) 1 1
> 17 b./ , 23 b./ , 32 b./ , 33 b./ , 34 b./
>
>
> one way to turn the format into a gerund
>
>
> ('''''`'Cloak@('&o.'Cloak)each 1 2 3)`:0
> 1&o.`(2&o.)`(3&o.)`:0
>
> ('''''`'Cloak@('&o.'Cloak)each 1 2 3)/. o. 3 %~ 0.25 0.5 0.75
> 0.258819
> 0.866025
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]>
> To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 11:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Adverbial Tacit Jym
>
> Let us keep the adverbial writing challenges/exercises open (non-tacit
> solutions are also welcome).  Why not?  ;)
>
>
> Mapping nouns to proverbs...
>
>
> Exercise 9.0
>
> Produce an adverb  boolean  such that it maps the  b.  codes to their
> corresponding proverbs; thus,
>
>    'and or rotate shift signedshift'=.  17 23 32 33 34 boolean
>
>    NB. Alternatively,  (and`or`rotate`shift`signedshift)=. 17 23 32 33 34
> boolean if the names
>    NB. and, or, rotate, shift  and  signedshift  are undefined or
> predefined as verbs
>
>    NB. 64-bit...
>    assert 48 80187 -: 12345 (and , or) 67890
>    assert 2468 -:1 rotate 1234
>    assert 576460752303423102 _386 -: _5 (shift , signedshift) _12345
>
>
> Exercise 9.1
>
> Produce an adverb  circle  such that it maps the  o.  codes to their
> corresponding proverbs; thus,
>
>    'sin cos tan'=. 1 2 3 circle
>       NB. Alternatively,  (sin`cos`tan)=. 1 2 3 circle  if
>       NB. sin, cos and tan are undefined or predefined as verbs
>
>    (sin`cos`tan)/. o. 3 %~ 0.25 0.5 0.75
> 0.258819
> 0.866025
>        1
>
>    'asin acos atan'=. (-1 2 3) circle
>
>    assert (,. -: (asin`acos`atan/.) @: (sin`cos`tan/.)) o. 3 %~ 0.25 0.5
> 0.75
>
>
> ___________________
>
> create a tacit verb parameterized (a double verb)
>
>
> '@:(o.@:(%&3))'Cloak@:('/.'Cloak@:(('''''`'Cloak@('&o.'Cloak)each )))
> ,^:(0:`(@:(o.@:(%&3))))@:(,^:(0:`/.)@:(,^:(0:`''`)@(,^:(0:`(&o.)))&.>))
>
> '@:(o.@:(%&3))'Cloak@:('/.'Cloak@:(('''''`'Cloak@('&o.'Cloak)each ))) (1
> 2 3)
> 1&o.`(2&o.)`(3&o.)/.@:(o.@:(%&3))
>
> '@:(o.@:(%&3))'Cloak@:('/.'Cloak@:(('''''`'Cloak@('&o.'Cloak)each )))(1 2
> 3) 0.25 0.5 0.75
> 0.258819
> 0.866025
> 1
>
> is there a way to make this expression a dyad instead of a double verb?
> ie. use x for one parameter (1 2 3) and y for 0.25 0.5 0.75
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to