Wow! Being able to distinguish the datatype of a displayed value by it's
appearance. And have the ability to control the datatype of a stored value
by entering the value in the required format. What a novel, (and very
useful) idea!

Skip

Skip Cave
Cave Consulting LLC

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:11 AM, robert therriault <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Bill,
>
> If you extended this idea to rationals so that 3r1 displayed as 3r1
> instead of 3 then you would have a way to distinguish rational and extended
> types from integers.
>
> This could be done with floats as well, so that by including the decimal
> point and the right 0, you could immediately see that 1.0 was a float
> result and was different from the integer 1.
>
> Unicode and literal would still be a challenge to differentiate using text
> alone, but being able to clearly differentiate the numerical types through
> text display may be something to think about.
>
> Cheers, bob
>
> > On Aug 19, 2016, at 12:58 AM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > If you can take away the if(v->im) check, it then always displays
> > both real and imaginary parts. Not sure this should be done but
> > it looks harmless.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to