The reference did not make it last time; here it is,

[0]  [Jprogramming] Adverbial Tacit Jym  Jose Mario Quintana
     http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2016-August/045622.html




On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I am afraid that you must strengthen the rules; the easiest way would be
> to add "no cheating is allowed."  Otherwise, one can cheat easily [0]
>
> [0]
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Louis de Forcrand <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Alrighty then.
>>
>> Let’s start this off with a couple of rules:
>> - We can either count characters or tokens; I suggest tokens.
>>   Either one should be counted on fixed (f.) functions.
>> - Programs can be restricted to either tacit or explicit, or not.
>>   In the latter case counting tokens would be ambiguous, so I
>>   don’t think the two should be used together.
>>
>> Of course this could change from task to task, and should be clarified
>> at the beginning of new challenges.
>> I won’t be coming up with all of the challenges; you should make some
>> up too.
>>
>>
>> Without further ado, here is a simple first challenge:
>> Write a verb which takes a scalar N, and returns all solutions to the
>> N-Queens problem in the form of a rank-2 array of rank-1 permutation
>> vectors. Given a vector V, the queens’ coordinates are:
>>
>>         (,.~ i.@#) V
>>
>> This can be done because we know that no two queens can be
>> placed on the same row.
>>
>> I suggest counting tokens of tacit solutions using this verb:
>>
>>         scr=: #@;:@(5!:5)       NB. score verb: scr ‘foo’ ; ‘bar’ ; ‘baz’
>>
>> If you have a better suggestion for scoring or rules, feel free to chime
>> in.
>> In addition, if you feel your version is particularly elegant, or
>> efficient,
>> or posses any other attribute you deem worthy, please share it with us,
>> even if it is does not have an especially low score.
>>
>> I will be posting my contender soon.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Louis
>>
>>
>> > On 20 Aug 2016, at 21:47, Joe Bogner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi! Welcome. I think this is the right place.
>> >
>> > Source: http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >
>> > On Aug 20, 2016 3:35 PM, "Louis de Forcrand" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi everyone,
>> >>
>> >> Would this be the appropriate place for some Jolfing (J code golfing),
>> >> or is there a better place for this?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Louis
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to