Just played with the original expression a little and got: 2 4 (0 2"_)}3 2$0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 (0 3"_)}3 2$0 2 0 0 4 0 0 2 4 (0 4"_)}3 2$0 2 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 (0 5"_)}3 2$0 2 0 0 0 0 4 2 4 (0 6"_)}3 2$0 |index error | 2 4 (0 6"_)}3 2$0 2 4 (0 _1"_)}3 2$0 2 0 0 0 0 4
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > The verb form is different from the gerund form, for whatever reasons. > But this is documented in the dictionary (and in NuVoc, like Henry > mentioned earlier). > > I'm not sure what other answer can be given, other than going into > detailed explanations of how they are different, and/or why both forms > are useful. Or, perhaps, if we need "moral justification", we could go > into examples of quirks in other programming languages (but all > programming languages have quirks - they seem to be unavoidable - so > that might be boring). > > -- > Raul > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Brian Schott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This is what the OP needed, I think. > > Except that instead of the u} form this is the gerund form. > > So I don't think it is the answer, either. > > > > 2 4 [`(0 1"_)`]} 3 2$0 > > 2 4 > > 2 4 > > 0 0 > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I have removed the deprecation - it was my misunderstanding of something > >> Roger wrote. > >> > >> The gerund form would be, in simplest form, > >> > >> 2 4 [`0:`]} 3 2$0 > >> > >> -- > > (B=) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
