I am having mixed results comparing 805 and 806 using Andrew Nitikin's new script as a test.
These first results came with my very first attempts, and tho I only show 1 timespacex for both 805 and 806, there were about 3 similar results for each of the sq 128's which initially seemed to indicate a speed up for 806 but a serious increase in space needed. timespacex'sq 128' NB. 805 0.001809 4.19597e6 timespacex'8 ccEnhPh sq 128' NB. 805 0.702167 1.67882e7 timespacex'sq 128' NB. 806 0.000721 4.30618e6 timespacex'8 ccEnhPh sq 128' NB. 806 0.510017 8.874e7 I shut down my machine and repeated the timespacex for sq 128 and am now results more like the following for both 805 and 806, which seems to indicate no difference between the two. timespacex'sq 128' 0.00131 4.30618e6 I guess I am worried that the slow down in speed from the first run to all the rest is an issue, but I cannot reproduce it. JVERSION Engine: j806/j64avx/darwin Beta-3: commercial/2017-04-10T18:24:03 Library: 8.06.02 Platform: Darwin 64 Installer: J806 install InstallPath: /users/brian/j64-806 Contact: www.jsoftware.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
