I don't know which one is wrong. The Dictionary has errors and
omissions, and the implementation is what it is. I agree that they
should be made consistent. That's a work in progress.
Henry Rich
On 6/22/2017 5:58 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Since the dictionary defines the language, I think a better way of
stating the issue is that the implementation incorrectly does
something different?
Thanks,
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
